Traditional v. Economic Analysis and Cardozo v. Posner
Scholars continue to debate the merits of traditional legal analysis compared to contemporary economic analysis of law. Each has virtues and both pose trade-offs. Adding to the extensive discourse, now available on SSRN is my new article probing the comparative appeal of these two approaches.
I offer a novel approach to the longstanding debate. I focus on judicial opinions of Benjamin Cardozo and Richard Posner. I use the context of tort law, where economic analysis has enjoyed most impressive success. I chose these two judges because their opinions appear more often than any other judge’s in current torts casebooks and they epitomize the competing methods.
My analysis led me to conclude that Cardozo’s traditional approach has the better of Posner’s economic approach. I would be delighted to hear criticism of the paper and its conclusions.