Response: Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement
PENNumbra‘s featured works are now available at the NEW AND IMPROVED www.pennumbra.com.
Howell E. Jackson responds to John C. Coffee, Jr.’s Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 229 (2007).
Professor Jackson, in his Response, The Impact of Enforcement: A Reflection, seeks to tease out the “not inconsiderable challenges” scholars might face in attempting to confirm or rebut Professor Coffee’s core argument—“that higher levels of enforcement in the United States provide a genuine benefit to U.S. financial markets.” For example, Professor Jackson points out that when comparing regulatory efforts at the international level, it is difficult to know the extent to which “resources allocated to regulatory agencies . . . [may] serv[e] as sinecures for cronies of political elites or positions from which to extract bribes.” After considering a number of other problems that complicate the comparison process, Professor Jackson suggest two alternative approaches that might help overcome the complexities he identifies: 1) “focus on technical measures of financial performance;” and 2) “examin[e] the behavior of market participants.”
As always, please click on the PENNumbra link to read previous
Responses and Debates, or to check out pdfs of the Penn Law Review‘s print edition articles.