Category: Law Rev Contents

0

Harvard Law Review, 125: 8 (2012)

 

Harvard Law Review

Volume 125 · June 2012 · Number 8

  

IN MEMORIAM
In Memoriam: Bernard Wolfman
Howard Abrams, William D. Andrews, N. Jerold Cohen, Michael A. Fitts, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Martha Minow, Daniel N. Shaviro

ARTICLE
Spatial Diversity
Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos

BOOK REVIEW
The Undead Constitution
Michael C. Dorf

DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW
Developments in the Law — Presidential Authority

RECENT CASES
Ninth Circuit Holds that Traffic Citation Is Not an “Intervening Arrest” Under Section 4A1.2(A)(2) of the Guidelines. — United States v. Leal-Felix, 665 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc).

Federal Circuit Applies New Factors in Deciding Patentability of a Computer Program. — Ultramercial, LLC v. Hulu, LLC, 657 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2011), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, No. 2010-1544, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25055 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 18, 2011).

Ninth Circuit Upholds First Trial Conviction Under § 1831 of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. — United States v. Chung, 659 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 11-1141, 2012 WL 929750 (U.S. Apr. 16, 2012).

Eleventh Circuit Rejects Challenge to Georgia’s “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” Standard for Defendants’ Mental Retardation Claims. — Hill v. Humphrey, 662 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2011) (en banc).

D.C. Circuit Holds that Government Intelligence Reports Are Entitled to a Presumption of Regularity. — Latif v. Obama, 666 F.3d 746 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Ninth Circuit Holds that Compensation for Blood Stem Cell Transplant Procedure Does Not Violate the National Organ Transplant Act. — Flynn v. Holder, No. 10-55643, 2012 WL 1001300 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2012).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications
  

0

Stanford Law Review, 64.5 (2012)

Stanford Law Review

Volume 64 • Issue 5 • May 2012

Articles
The City and the Private Right of Action
Paul A. Diller
64 Stan. L. Rev. 1109

Securities Class Actions Against Foreign Issuers
Merritt B. Fox
64 Stan. L. Rev. 1173

How Much Should Judges Be Paid?
An Empirical Study on the Effect of Judicial Pay on the State Bench

James M. Anderson & Eric Helland
64 Stan. L. Rev. 1277

Note
How Congress Could Reduce Job Discrimination by Promoting Anonymous Hiring
David Hausman
64 Stan. L. Rev. 1343

0

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 62, Number 2, Spring 2012

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 62, Number 2, Spring 2012

The Sword in the Zone: Fantasies of Land-Use Planning Law
Ed Morgan

Recent Developments in WTO Jurisprudence: Has the Appellate Body Resolved the Issue of an Appropriate Standard of Review in SPS Cases?
Tracey Epps

Corrective Justice and Unjust Enrichment
Matthew Doyle

The Logic of Planning and the Aim of the Law
N E Simmonds

Why Compare? Comments on Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D Dubber’s The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law
Leo Zaibert

Full text of the University of Toronto Law Journal  is available online at UTLJ Online,  Project Muse, JSTOR, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Westlaw-CARSWELL, LexisNexis and Quicklaw

0

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.4 (May 2012)

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.4 (May 2012)

Articles
A Profession, If You Can Keep It: How Information Technology and Fading Borders Are Reshaping the Law Marketplace and What We Should Do About It
Stephen Gillers

Issue Preclusion Effect of Class Certification Orders
Antonio GIdi

The Evolution of Unconstitutionality in Sex Offender Registration Laws
Catherine L. Carpenter and Amy E. Beverlin

Notes

A Culture Without Consequences? Redefining Purposeful Availment for Wrongful Online Conduct
Jenny L. Grantz

Reducing Civil Litigation Costs by Promoting Technological Innovation: Adopting Standards of Reasonableness in E-Discovery
Kelly Foss

Hastings Law Journal Voir Dire

The Hastings Law Journal’s online companion, Voir Dire, is now accepting submissions.

Recent Essays:
Sustainable Capitalism: Revelations from the Japanese Model
Joel Slawotsky

Right-Sizing Bar Association Governance
Daniel R. Suhr

0

Symposium: The New Private Law

 

Harvard Law Review

Online Forum

 

Responding to Shyamkrishna Balganesh, The Obligatory Structure of Copyright Law: Unbundling the Wrong of Copying

Copyright Is Not About Copying
Abraham Drassinower

Unifying Copyright: An Instrumentalist’s Response to Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Richard A. Epstein

Responding to Henry E. Smith, Property as the Law of Things

Exclusion and Private Law Theory: A Comment on Property as the Law of Things
Eric R. Claeys

Property as Modularity
Thomas W. Merrill

Responding to Stephen A. Smith, Duties, Liabilities, and Damages

Comments on Stephen Smith’s Duties, Liabilities, and Damages
Emily Sherwin

Responding to Benjamin C. Zipursky, Palsgraf, Punitive Damages, and Preemption

New Private Law Theory and Tort Law: A Comment
Keith N. Hylton

Method and Morality in the New Private Law of Torts
John Oberdiek

0

Harvard Law Review, 125: 7 (2012)

 

Harvard Law Review

Volume 125 · May 2012 · Number 7

 

ARTICLE
Regulation for the Sake of Appearance
Adam M. Samaha

SYMPOSIUM
THE NEW PRIVATE LAW

Introduction: Pragmatism and Private Law
John C.P. Goldberg

The Obligatory Structure of Copyright Law: Unbundling the Wrong of Copying
Shyamkrishna Balganesh

Property as the Law of Things
Henry E. Smith

Duties, Liabilities, and Damages
Stephen A. Smith

Palsgraf, Punitive Damages, and Preemption
Benjamin C. Zipursky

NOTES
The Perils of Fragmentation and Reckless Innovation

Independence, Congressional Weakness, and the Importance of Appointment: The Impact of Combining Budgetary Autonomy with Removal Protection

RECENT CASES
Ninth Circuit Holds Female Plaintiffs Brought Valid Excessive Force Claims Against Police Officers Who Tased Them. — Mattos v. Agarano, 661 F.3d 433 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc).

Second Circuit Declines to Extend Ricci v. DeStefano. — Briscoe v. City of New Haven, 654 F.3d 200 (2d Cir. 2011).

Ninth Circuit Affirms 262-Month Sentence Based on Uncharged Murder. — United States v. Fitch, 659 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 2011).

Ninth Circuit Holds that Teacher Speech in School-Related Settings Is Necessarily Government Speech. — Johnson v. Poway Unified School District, 658 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2011).

RECENT LEGISLATION
Congress Restricts Guantánamo Transfers, Prompting Constitutional Signing Statement Objection. — National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Pub. L. No. 112-81, 125 Stat. 1298 (2011) (to be codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS
>Recent Publications

0

Maryland Law Review 71:3 (May 2012)

Volume 71 | Issue 3 | May 2012

Articles

Mary Anne Franks, Sexual Harassment 2.o

Ari Ezra Waldman, Hostile Educational Environments

Amanda Conley, Anupam Datta, Helen Nissenbaum & Divya Sharma, Sustaining Privacy and Open Justice in the Transition to Online Court Records: A Multidisciplinary Inquiry

Comments

Anne Havemann, Surviving the Commerce Clause: How Maryland Can Square Its Renewable Energy Laws with the Federal Constitution

Christine E. White, Clearly Erroneous: The Court of Appeals of Maryland’s Misguided Shift to a Higher Standard for Post-Conviction DNA Relief

Note

Wayne Heavener, Montgomery County v. Shropshire: Trying to Shoehorn Police Intradepartmental Disciplinary Files into the Wrong Cabinet

0

Stanford Law Review, 64.4 (2012)

Stanford Law Review

Volume 64 • Issue 4 • April 2012

Articles
The Tragedy of the Carrots:
Economics and Politics in the Choice of Price Instruments

Brian Galle
64 Stan. L. Rev. 797

“They Saw a Protest”:
Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction

Dan M. Kahan, David A. Hoffman, Donald Braman, Danieli Evans & Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
64 Stan. L. Rev. 851

Constitutional Design in the Ancient World
Adriaan Lanni & Adrian Vermeule
64 Stan. L. Rev. 907

The Copyright-Innovation Tradeoff:
Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Intentional Infliction of Harm

Dotan Oliar
64 Stan. L. Rev. 951

Notes
Testing Three Commonsense Intuitions About Judicial Conduct Commissions
Jonathan Abel
64 Stan. L. Rev. 1021

Derivatives Clearinghouses and Systemic Risk:
A Bankruptcy and Dodd-Frank Analysis

Julia Lees Allen
64 Stan. L. Rev. 1079

0

Harvard Law Review, 125: 6 (2012)

 

Harvard Law Review

Volume 125 · April 2012 · Number 6

 

ARTICLE
Inventing the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination
Cary Franklin

BOOK REVIEWS
Law and the President
Richard H. Pildes

Crime and Law: An American Tragedy
Robert Weisberg

NOTES
Everlasting Software

Improving the Carceral Conditions of Federal Immigrant Detainees

RECENT CASES
Sixth Circuit Holds that Defense Counsel’s Nap During a Cross-Examination Does Not Clearly Violate the Sixth Amendment. — Muniz v. Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011).

Second Circuit Finds Affirmative Speech Condition on Leadership Act Funds Unconstitutional. — Alliance for Open Society International v. U.S. Agency for International Development, 651 F.3d 218 (2d Cir. 2011).

New Jersey Supreme Court Uses Psychological Research to Update Admissibility Standards for Out-of-Court Identifications. — State v. Henderson, 27 A.3d 872 (N.J. 2011).

Third Circuit Holds that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 Authorizes Immigration Detention Only for a “Reasonable Period of Time.” — Diop v. ICE/Homeland Security, 656 F.3d 221 (3d Cir. 2011).

Ninth Circuit Requires Continued Federal Oversight of School District. — Fisher v. Tucson Unified School District, 652 F.3d 1131 (9th Cir. 2011).

Second Circuit Holds that the First Sale Doctrine Does Not Apply to Imported Works Manufactured and First Sold Abroad. — John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2011).

RECENT ADMINISTRATIVE INTERPRETATION
Obama Administration Argues that U.S. Military Action in Libya Does Not Constitute “Hostilities.” — Libya and War Powers: Hearing Before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 112th Cong. 7–40 (2011) (statement of Harold Koh, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State).

RECENT LEGISLATION
United Kingdom Adds Barrier to Private Prosecution of Universal Jurisdiction Crimes. — Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act, 2011, c. 13 (U.K.).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications

0

Stanford Law Review, 64.3 (2012)

Stanford Law Review

Volume 64 • Issue 3 • March 2012