Category: Law Rev Contents

0

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.6 (August 2012)

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.6 (August 2012) The Symposium Issue: Law & Policy of the Developing Brain: Neuroscience from Womb to Death

Articles
Bridging Developmental Neuroscience and the Law: Child-Caregiver Relationships
Ross A. Thompson

The Relevance of Immaturities in the Juvenile Brain to Culpability and Rehabilitation
Beatriz Luna

Developmental Neuroscience, Children’s Relationships with Primary Caregivers, and Child Protection Policy Reform
Lois A. Weithorn

The Neurobiology of Attachment to Nurturing and Abusive Caregivers
Regina M. Sullivan, Ph.D.

Creating a Clearinghouse to Evaluate Environmental Risks to Fetal Development
Kate E. Bloch

Fetal Risks of Environmental Chemicals: The Motherisk Approach to the Organic Mercury Fish Consumption Scare
Zahra Jahedmotlage, Kathie Schoeman, John Bend, & Gideon Koren

Poor Women and the Protective State
Khiara M. Bridges

Notes

The Government Can Read Your Mind: Can the Constitution Stop It?
Mara Boundy

Corporate Codes of Conduct: Binding Contract or Ideal Publicity?
Haley Revak

Hastings Law Journal Voir Dire

The Hastings Law Journal’s online companion, Voir Dire, is now accepting submissions.

Recent Essays:
The Long-Awaited Nationwide Mortgage Settlement:
Only a Small Step Forward in the Struggle for Accountability in the Financial Crisis

Julia Mas-Guindal

0

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 63, Number 1, Winter 2013

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 63, Number 1, Winter 2013

Focus Feature: Foxes, Seals, Whales and the Rule of Capture: Animals in the Law and Legal History
The common-law rule on the capture of wild animals is often cited by law and economics scholars to demonstrate the superiority of clear rules over vague or “fuzzy” standards. In countless property law courses, the famous fox hunt case, Pierson v. Post (1805), is used to support the “catch it and kill it if you can” view of property: mere pursuit of a wild animal is insufficient to establish possession. Where “hot pursuit” might have been sufficient according to the sportsman’s custom, escape was always possible, and the law preferred certainty. In this forthcoming focus feature edited by Angela Fernandez (Law, University of Toronto), four scholars spanning law and history challenge this rules v. standards approach to the rule of capture, demonstrating that, understood historically, the situation is much more complicated and interesting – which wild animal, which type of hunting, in what period all turn out to be important. 

Editor’s Note
Angela Fernandez

Animals Accurs’d: Ferae Naturae And The Law Of Property In Nineteenth-Century North America
Christopher Tomlins

The Law Of Capture, Newfoundland-Style
Bruce Ziff

The Judicial Invention Of Property Norms: Ellickson’s Whalemen Revisited
Robert Deal

Fuzzy Rules and Clear Enough Standards: The Uses and Abuses of Pierson V Post
Angela Fernandez

The Entitlements of Unallied Hunters After aSequential Capture
Robert C Ellickson

LECTURE AND COMMENTARY

Inside Property
Hanoch Dagan

Pluralism, Context, and The Internal Life Of Property: A Response To Hanoch Dagan
Lisa M Austin

REVIEW ARTICLE

Law Versus Politics
Rachel E Barkow

BOOK REVIEW

Philosophy Of Criminal Law: Selected Essays
Andrew Botterell

Full text of the University of Toronto Law Journal is available online at UTLJ Online, Project Muse, JSTOR, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Westlaw-CARSWELL, LexisNexis and Quicklaw.

0

Florida Law Review, 64:6 (December 2012)

Florida Law Review Banner

December 2012 | Volume 64, Number 6 

Articles

Martin H. Redish & Matthew B. Arnould, Judicial Review, Constitutional Interpretation, and the Democratic Dilemma: Proposing a “Controlled Activism” Alternative

Erwin Chemerinsky, The Elusive Quest for Value Neutral Judging: A Response to Redish and Arnould

Gary Lawson, No History, No Certainty, No Legitimacy . . . No Problem: Originalism and the Limits of Legal Theory

Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults

George W. Dent, Jr., Corporate Governance: The Sweedish Solution

Ben Trachtenberg, Confronting Coventurers: Coconspirator Hearsay, Sir Walter Raleigh, and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause

Derek W. Black, Civil Rights, Charter Schools, and Lessons to be Learned

Notes

Nicole Kuncl, Seeing Red: The Legal Backlash Against Red-Light Cameras in Florida

Lauren Rehm, A Proposal for Settling the Interpretation of Florida’s Proposals for Settlement

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 1 (January 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 1 (January 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our January issue.

 

ARTICLES

Tun-Jen Chiang, The Reciprocity of Search, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2013).

Michael D. Frakes & Melissa F. Wasserman, Does Agency Funding Affect Decisionmaking?: An Empirical Assessment of the PTO’s Granting Patterns, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 67 (2013).

Andrew Kent, Judicial Review for Enemy Fighters: The Court’s Fateful Turn in Ex parte Quirin, the Nazi Saboteur Case, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 153 (2013).

Joanna M. Shepherd, Products Liability and Economic Activity: An Empirical Analysis of Tort Reform’s Impact on Businesses, Employment, and Production, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 257 (2013).

 

NOTES

Taylor M. Owings, Identifying a Maverick: When Antitrust Law Should Protect a Low-Cost Competitor, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 323 (2013).

V. Blair Druhan, Severe or Pervasive: An Analysis of Who, What, and Where Matters When Determining Sexual Harassment, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 355 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 34, Issue 2


Articles

Cartels as Rational Business Strategy: Crime Pays
John M. Connor & Robert H. Lande 427

Dynamic Fiduciary Duties
Andrew S. Gold 491

The Twilight of Equity Liquidity
Jeff Schwartz 531

The Cultural Analysis Paradigm: Women and Synagogue Ritual as a Case Study
Roberta Rosenthal Kwall 609

Can a Computer Intercept Your Email?
Bruce E. Boyden 669

Discovery About Discovery: Sampling Practice and the Resolution of Discovery  Disputes in an Age of Ever-Increasing Information
Charles Yablon & Nick Landsman-Roos 719

Notes 

Terminating Beyond the Limits: CMS Is Overreaching in Its Attempt to Regulate ACOs According to Antitrust Standards
Benjamin M. Zegarelli 781

A Power and a Duty: Prosecutorial Discretion and Obligation in United States Sentencing Guideline § 3E1.1(B)
Laura Waters 813

A New Paradigm: Domicile as the Exclusive Basis for the Exercise of General Jurisdiction over Individual Defendants
Emily Eng 845

 

For more information on responding to any of these articles on Cardozo Law Review’s online companion, Cardozo Law Review de•novo, please visit us here.

1

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 6 (November 2012): Supply and Demand: Barriers to a New Energy Future Symposium

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 6 (November 2012).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our November issue, featuring articles from the Symposium held at Vanderbilt Law School on February 24, 2012, Supply and Demand: Barriers to a New Energy Future.

 

ARTICLES

Michael P. Vandenbergh, J.B. Ruhl & Jim Rossi, Symposium: Introduction, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1447 (2012).

Robert H. Socolow, Truths We Must Tell Ourselves to Manage Climate Change, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1455 (2012).

Daniel A. Farber, Sustainable Consumption, Energy Policy, and Individual Well-Being, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1479 (2012).

Michael P. Vandenbergh & Jim Rossi, Good for You, Bad for Us: The Financial Disincentive for Net Demand Reduction, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1527 (2012).

Katrina Fischer Kuh, Personal Environmental Information: The Promise and Perils of the Emerging Capacity to Identify Individual Environmental Harms, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1565 (2012).

Noah M. Sachs, Can We Regulate Our Way to Energy Efficiency? Product Standards as Climate Policy, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1631 (2012).

Uma Outka, Environmental Law and Fossil Fuels: Barriers to Renewable Energy, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1679 (2012).

Dan Tarlock, Hydro Law and the Future of Hydoelectric Power Generation in the United States, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1723 (2012).

J.B. Ruhl, Harmonizing Commercial Wind Power and the Endangered Species Act Through Administrative Reform, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1769 (2012).

Alexandra B. Klass & Elizabeth J. Wilson, Interstate Transmission Challenges for Renewable Energy: A Federalism Mismatch, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1801 (2012).

Sara C. Bronin, Building-Related Renewable Energy and the Case of 360 State Street, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1875 (2012).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 62, Number 4, Fall 2012

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 62, Number 4, Fall 2012

Errors of Fact and Law: Race, Space, and Hockey in Christie v York
Eric M Adams

Electoral Fairness and the Law of Democracy: A Structural Rights Approach to Judicial Review
Yasmin Dawood

The Society of Property
Avihay Dorfman

Sexual History Evidence in Cases of Sexual Assault: A Critical Re-evaluation
Liat Levanon

Full text of the University of Toronto Law Journal is available online at UTLJ Online, Project Muse, JSTOR, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Westlaw-CARSWELL, LexisNexis and Quicklaw.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 5 (October 2012)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 5 (October 2012).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our October issue.

 

ARTICLES

Wayne A. Logan, Constitutional Cacophony: Federal Circuit Splits and the Fourth Amendment, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1137 (2012).

Terry A. Maroney, Angry Judges, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1207 (2012).

Morgan Ricks, A Regulatory Design for Monetary Stability, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1289 (2012).

 

NOTES

Angela L. Bergman, For Their Own Good? Exploring Legislative Responses to the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children and the Illinois Safe Children Act, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1361 (2012).

Marcy Nicks Moody, WARNING: MAY CAUSE WARMING Potential Trade Challenges to Private Environmental Labels, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1401 (2012).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc – New Publications

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to announce several new publications.

Three response essays in our Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Roundtable are now available, including:

Revisiting Grutter and Its Diversity Rationale: A Few Reactions to Professor Blumstein’s Critique
Vikram David Amar · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 195 (2012)

Whatever
Girardeau A. Spann · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 203 (2012)

The Education of an Admissions Office
Gerald Torres · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 211 (2012)

We have also published two new book reviews:

American Legal History Revisited
James W. Ely, Jr. · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 185 (2012), Reviewing: G. Edward White, Law in American History, Volume 1: From the Colonial Years Through the Civil War (Oxford University Press, 2012).

Justice for All?
Rebecca K. Lee · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 217 (2012), Reviewing: Judith Resnik & Dennis Curtis, Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms (Yale University Press, 2011).

3

Florida Law Review, 64:5 (September 2012)

Florida Law Review Banner

September 2012 | Volume 64, Number 5

Articles

Benjamin H. Barton, An Empirical Study of Supreme Court Justice Pre-Appointment Experience

Chad M. Oldfather, Joseph P. Bockhorst & Brian P. Dimmer, Triangulating Judicial Responsiveness: Automated Content Analysis, Judicial Opinions, and the Methodology of Legal Scholarship

Gerard N. Magliocca, The Gold Clause Cases and Constitutional Necessity

Michael Risch, America’s First Patents

Jacqueline D. Lipton, Law of the Intermediated Information Exchange

Chad Flanders, Election Law Behind a Veil of Ignorance

Essays

Justin R. Pidot, The Invisibility of Jurisdictional Procedure and its Consequences

Scott G. Hawkins, Perspective on Judicial Merit Retention in Florida

Stuart R. Cohn, The New Crowdfunding Registration Exemption: Good Idea, Bad Execution

Note

Amanda Harris, Surpassing Sentencing: The Controversial Next Step in Confrontation Clause Jurisprudence Good Idea, Bad Execution