Recommended Reading: David A. Super’s Against Flexibility

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. Ken Rhodes says:

    >>programs built around flexibility failed badly through a combination of late and defective decisions.>>

    And these situations, and observations, are attributable to many aspects of our lives — law, business, sports and games, the arts …

    There are, of course, examples on the opposite side, where maintaining flexibility until the last minute preserves options, so as to be able to take the most effective action precisely when it’s needed.

    Nevertheless, a problem with folks who want to “maintain flexibility” is that they never know for sure when that moment has arrived, so the action is often taken when it’s no longer so effective as a plausible alternative action would have been if more timely. Thus having a set of templates prepared in advance is almost always productive.

    And this is an illustration of Rhodes’ Rule of Uncertainty: Life is more complicated than you realize, even when you take into account Rhodes’ Rule.

  2. A.J. Sutter says:

    This article lost me at ‘hello’: WHY should both public and private law (or either of them) be understood as “a productive activity converting information, norms, and decisional and enforcement capacity into outputs of social value”? (Let’s leave aside for now the problems with the whole “social value” metaphor.) Aren’t there also, say, expressive aspects to law? Douglas Kysar’s Regulating from Nowhere shows how this expressiveness is particularly important to decisions made in conditions of “information scarcity” (apropos of the precautionary principle).

    And if they do constitute a productive activity, why waste time advocating anything like our current system? Wouldn’t kangaroo courts and absolute dictatorship be more productive? Or consider the workload of Minos, Aiakos and Rhadamanthys, who had to judge all souls of the dead. Hell is a great model of productive legal decision making. Though perhaps some folks in the States are catching on to that.