The ABA’s Ugly Table Fetish

Dave Hoffman

Dave Hoffman is the Murray Shusterman Professor of Transactional and Business Law at Temple Law School. He specializes in law and psychology, contracts, and quantitative analysis of civil procedure. He currently teaches contracts, civil procedure, corporations, and law and economics.

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. Gato Points says:

    I really need to read these post before I forward them to everyone. Just reading the headline and seeing the picture I though the story was that ABA was literally changing their decor. Like the TSA, I should’ve checked more before I jumped to my conclusion:


  2. I agree that the table is ugly. But it is a standard format. If every law school fills it out in this form, then it becomes much easier for anyone to take the raw data and create good visualizations of it. It’s better to put the simple informational mandate on the law schools, and leave it up to the wider “market” of interested people to come up with the compelling visualizations that make it meaningful.

    Even better would be if the ABA required each law school to publish the data using a standard XML schema, and then just made available to everyone the XML file containing each year’s information from the tables.

  3. dave hoffman says:

    But that seems precisely wrong to me. Creating a disclosure standard for lots of private firms that requires (or assumes) the existence of some other third party intermediary to be useful is bad policy. Let the firms compete on how to best display the information – if you want – and let prospective applicants thereby understand how important salary and employment outcomes are for each school.

    Also, why these particular slices of outcomes (quartiles? dividing between firms based on # of attorneys at the firms)? If the ABA really wants to meddle, why not force schools to survey all grads at a year and ask if they are happy with their jobs and if they make enough to cover expenses and debt. That would be just as meaningful. Which is to say, not very.

  4. anon says:

    “Let the firms compete on how to best display the information – if you want – and let prospective applicants thereby understand how important salary and employment outcomes are for each school.”

    Sorry, I don’t follow. This is precisely the reason the ABA is talking about disclosure. Because law schools have no incentive to provide adequate disclosures.

  5. Dave Hoffman says:


    1. I don’t know why you think law schools have “no incentive to provide adequate disclosures.” Aren’t they competing for applicants? Assuming that the market is moving toward higher demand for information like this, I think supply would increase too.

    2. But even if that weren’t true, my point is that law schools can compete on how to disclose, with the ABA providing a baseline of the substantive content and a requirement of fair display. The requirement, perversely, makes it all but impossible to understand the material because it is buried in an enormous, multi-factorial, enormous table. Who does that help?

  6. anon says:

    1. Yes, law schools are competing for applicants That is why the incentive is to distort numbers to make the school look better to applicants.

    2. Complexity is not a virtue when it comes to reporting, but neither is utter simplicity. Both can skew reality. Why not figure out a clear set of guidelines that provide information prospective students are interested in, and do it in a precise a clear way? Of course, some people will complain, but at least prospective students will have, in theory, a more accurate picture of each school.

  7. Dave, it’s only your final paragraph that I have an issue with: my argument is that if disclosure is to be mandated, than it should be raw-data disclosure. Let the law schools compete on the pretty pictures as well if they want, but raw data is the necessary baseline to enable third parties to get into the visualization and presentation game.

    Government open data efforts are demonstrating the wisdom of the “If you build it, they will come” approach. See the Princeton Government Data and the Invisible Hand paper. Given scarce resources, it’s better to provide standardized data than polished visualizations, because it acts as an input to an open innovative ecosystem.

  8. Dave Hoffman says:

    Totally fair, and I think I agree with you. The ABA could fairly require disclosure of an xml file to some central authority. It could also require schools to display the data on their websites, in whatever form the school deemed appropriate, so long as it was not misleading or obscuring.

    The point is really that tables like these are the least useful form of disclosure (to no disclosure). The seem like they are precise and clear, but actually they are hard to read and often get ignored.