Error in SCOTUS Jones v. Harris Opinion

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. MJG says:

    Wow. Good stuff. Sounds to me like the Court (or at least Justice Alito) wanted to jump from one conclusion supported by the cases to one it wants to be supported, i.e. that enforcement of this section results in courts acting as “ratemakers.”

  2. Logan Roise says: